On practising with AI without giving up judgement, privilege, or your evenings. Plain, practical, written for working firms.
The honest answer is: it depends entirely on where the data goes. Here is the line that separates an AI tool you can safely put a privileged file into from one you can't.
Read →We're pre-launch and we say so. The capabilities page lists every concrete action with its real status, checked against the code, and roadmap items aren't dressed up as done. Where the product is now, and what's next.
Read →Flat per seat, a generous monthly allowance, a managed key with no setup, bring-your-own-key at the top, and none of the scarcity games. The philosophy behind the pricing — figures live on the pricing page.
Read →A populated demo that takes a fictional matter through the whole product in a few minutes — no card, no commitment. We would rather show you than tell you.
Read →The architecture that lets one engine serve several markets without ever bleeding one jurisdiction into another — and how we opened new markets on the same core without translating anything.
Read →A product should get better the more a firm uses it — but not by quietly harvesting matter content. Our self-learning layer is off by default, opts in explicitly, and never lets matter content leave the firm.
Read →Translating one market's legal product into another's language produces something that reads plausibly and gets the law wrong. We build each jurisdiction to its own frame instead — here is what that costs and what it buys.
Read →Solicitors live in Word, Outlook and Excel — not in a browser tab. So we put the agent fleet inside those tools: a Word ribbon, an Outlook task-pane that matches an email to a matter, and an Excel batch counterparty lookup.
Read →HMCTS court forms and pleadings, native to England and Wales — the N-series, the workflows that chain them, and a litigant-in-person mode, all pre-populated from the matter you already have open.
Read →Client-account reconciliation to SRA standards, time, cashflow and invoicing — in the same system where the matters already live. The firm's money, handled where the work is.
Read →On the Enterprise tier you bring your own AI-provider key. Your usage is billed by your provider, at their rates, never marked up by us. Your contract for the model is with the provider, not with us.
Read →A matter is not a list of documents. It is a shape — a chronology, a set of relationships, a caseload with deadlines. So we built four ways to see that shape, not just scroll a file list.
Read →A signed, chain-linked record of every AI step on a matter, exportable in one click. When the regulator asks how AI was used, you hand over evidence — tamper-evident, verifiable end to end — rather than an afternoon of reconstruction and an open question.
Read →A running register of the matter's risks — limitation, deadlines, conflicts, exposure — that moves when the matter moves. Because it is built from the same structured case the rest of the product writes to, it does not wait for someone to remember to update a spreadsheet.
Read →The assistant drafts; you review, edit and sign. It is never autonomous on anything that leaves the matter. The oversight other tools bury in an enterprise tier is on for every firm from day one — because a solicitor's judgement is the point, not the friction.
Read →Click a compliance check on a live matter and get a read grounded in the SRA Code of Conduct — tied to what actually happened on that matter, not a generic template. The record is built from real activity, so it holds up when someone asks.
Read →Every authority the assistant cites is checked against the real source before it reaches you. The draft is held at a gate until you confirm each reference — so a case that never existed cannot walk into court in your name.
Read →Click 'run adversary pass' on a draft and the tool argues the other side's case against yours across a set of critique angles — procedure, evidence, limitation, quantum and more — each finding anchored to the statute, rule or authority it relies on. You read your own weaknesses before opposing counsel does.
Read →Click 'prepare case' on a matter and the tool marshals what the file already contains — parties, claims, evidence, authorities, the date spine — into a typed skeleton. You start from a prepared position rather than a blank page, and edit the judgement calls yourself.
Read →Type a counterparty name and get a structured intel card built from public UK registers — Companies House, the SRA register, OFSI, AML sources — with every fact linked back to the register entry it came from. No opaque summary; a card you can verify line by line.
Read →Before any text leaves the browser, names, identifiers and contact details are removed and replaced with stable tokens. The external model reasons about the case without ever learning who the client is. The real names are restored on your own machine when the answer comes back.
Read →A new matter arrives as an email thread, a contract, or a chaotic Word file. We built the intake to read those papers and propose a structured matter — parties, dates, issues, value — with every fact linked back to the paragraph it came from, for the fee-earner to confirm.
Read →Our client onboarding module does not hand you a to-do list. It produces the SRA and UK GDPR compliance pack itself — privacy notice, data-handling policy, DSAR workflow and more — as drafts, mapped to live regulator guidance, ready for review and sign-off.
Read →The first module we built: drop in the client, scope and fee basis, and get a jurisdiction-correct engagement letter draft in your firm's voice. A draft you review and sign — not a filing, and never machine-translated.
Read →The architecture behind the product: matter data lives in your browser's local storage on your own device. There is no vendor database to breach or subpoena. Here is what leaves your machine and what never does.
Read →How the privilege gate works: a check that runs in your browser before anything reaches an AI, warns before privileged material would leave, hard-blocks where the duty is absolute, and puts the decision in your hands every time.
Read →The founding post in our build log. A tool that processes your matter remotely has to receive the privileged file first. We started from the opposite decision — the matter stays on your machine — and built everything else around it.
Read →